Definitions

I see and hear people talking about things in a way that sort of bedazzles me. This is because some words or topics, are just too wide to have one singular perspective to encompass the entire meaning of that particular word or topic. One should realise that it is not the word that matters, it is the consequences or rather related affairs that matter. One should take into account the context of those related affairs before trying to define the word or topic. Then only can you debate on the domains of ethics, politics and socio-economics.

It will be utterly impossible to determine the correctness of a topic that has many dimensions to it. If you were to try and use one single denomination for its explaination, I shall be soft, you are but a little too naive. I do not resent the fact, I just wonder why people tend to keep things complicated and not try and split them up into little pieces to form a more complete and comprehensive picture. You can't draw an apple by just its shape, but you have to start with the leaf, roundish-shape and also the angle of which you are looking at it. Perception is not to be determined by one person, but by the entire human race. Whatever community you are in, there will definitely be more than one viewpoint to a single issue, even more in the entire world. Why not account the world, exploring the ideals and theories, before coming up with your concepts to debate on?

Decide which viewpoint you wish to discuss, and then you may work on from that viewpoint to another one. You may find that they are all related but still different because they affect different aspects of a the human existance.