Forgiveness from enlightenment
"whoever gives man the need to attain brotherhood, was the man who was willing to give man the chance to change. for brotherhood meant spreading of beliefs, the spreading of beliefs meant true understanding."
This analogy was collected among the initiations of thoughts in my mind while i read through articles on Metaphysics, transcendentalism, romanticism and other philosophies. This was brought about within the ramifications of a conversation about the meaning of aethism with a friend. It brings a more realistic view of the ever forgiving nature of god. In which religion, you may determine to yourself because i believe that there is more than one that depicts analogy.
The meaning of "brotherhood" in this case would be the followers of a religion. This is because the verse above is a representation of a larger scale of movements that are within the initiation stage. It brings about the beginnings of any religion because in a realistic sense, each philosophy starts from one man or source. Although one might argue that religious belief is already embedded within each man, but i will state that this is not stating what is within each man, but what was ignited by the thoughts of one source. Meaning, although every man may be brought onto this logic, it is the work of one source that determines which way that logic goes. Plus, it is also in the limitations of each man to which religion he will venture to. I will not be protagonist to any particular religion or belief in this instance. I will give each man and woman the right to decide on his own.
The meaning of "belief" is the teachings of the religion to which you denote yourself. It is the teachings that each source must fully understand and set limitations upon. In those teachings, the source must make sure each distinction is set our clearly before he spreads his teachings to other people that may become his followers or in this case "brothers". In order to maintain the faith in itself, the source must achieve true understanding. True understanding would mean being able to answer any doubt or opposing view towards the validity of any teaching within its own context. Any doubt must be answered and any view that may lead to the source being seen as a hypocrite must be liable to reasoning based on those same teachings. If these two things are not achieveable, it cannot be said to be true understanding.
To the main reason for this analogy, the forgiving nature of god in religion. The analogy that i have presented clearly states a chance presented to the source of spreading teachings. This chance is to spread the teachings in the context of true understanding. The change from damnation to a chance of righting the ways of mankind through those teachings has been bestowed by one (god), onto the source (percieved to be human). Thus, man is given free will to spread the teachings through untainted and pure renditions of the teachings. This act, ultimately spells out forgiveness because it is a chance to clear the name of humanity in the eyes of the one (god). This conclusion is liable because one must first give forgiveness before change for the better may be instigated.
Thus, through this we may see realistically, the forgiving nature of the one (god). May we all unite in this forgiveness.
No comments:
Post a Comment